Estate of Bohl, 12th Dist. Case Nos: CA-2015-01-005, CA-2015-01-006, 2016-Ohio-637. The son, appointed as executor of his deceased mother's estate, submitted a claim against her estate for reimbursement of $101,084.20 in medical bills and other expenses related to running the farm where his mother lived. The trial court denied the claim because the express verbal contract found to have been made between mother and son was unenforceable. The court of appeals reversed on the grounds that a family member can prove that an express contract existed with a deceased family member entirely on parol evidence. While the general presumption is that a family member rendering services to another family member is gratuitous, this presumption can be overcome by establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, the existence of an express contract between the parties. As such, the case was remanded back to the trial court to determine if the son could meet his burden of proof as to the contract's existence.
Recent Posts
- Please Welcome Poojan Patel to Reminger's Columbus, Ohio Office
- Reminger Secures Favorable Probate Court Judgment in Undue Influence Dispute
- Love, Death, And Litigation: Enforcing Prenuptial Agreements Upon Death
- The Illusion of Competence: Surviving the AI Wave Through Bans, Disclosures, and Bots
- Forrest and Gallagher secure a dismissal with prejudice in trust and fiduciary litigation involving the estate of the late Eric Carmen, a musician and Cleveland native
- Shana DeMooy Featured in Columbus Jewish News Local Lawyers / Super Attorneys 2026
- Jessica Forrest Elected as a Member of the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel (ACTEC)
- Michael Brody and Paul Shugar Secure Positive Result in Trust Dispute
- Strategies for Litigation-Proofing Estate Plans
- Reminger's Estates & Trusts Practice Group Recognized Nationally by Best Law Firms®











