The Eighth District Court of Appeals upheld a Cuyahoga County Probate Court decision to dismiss an intentional interference with an expectation of inheritance claim. The Appellate Court held that the former version of O.R.C. 2101.24, which sets forth the probate courts jurisdiction, did not grant the probate court the authority to hear the intentional interference with expectation of inheritance claim. The appellate court, however, speculated that the new version of O.R.C. 2101.24, which became effective on March 27 after the subject suit was filed, 2013, possibly would grant the probate court authority to hear the intentional interference with expectation of inheritance claim. Accordingly, the appellate court ruled the trial court properly dismissed the intentional interference with an expectation of inheritance claim.
Recent Posts
- Michael Brody and Paul Shugar Secure Positive Result in Trust Dispute
- Strategies for Litigation-Proofing Estate Plans
- Reminger's Estates & Trusts Practice Group Recognized Nationally by Best Law FirmsĀ®
- 11 Reminger Estate & Trust Attorneys Recognized in 2026 Edition of Best Lawyers in America
- Dissecting an Undue Influence Claim: A Practical Guide for Ohio Probate Litigators
- DeMooy, Forrest, and Shugar Publish Articles in the January/February 2025 Edition of Ohio Probate Law Journal
- Welcome, Adam Taylor!
- Jessica Forrest and Brittany Kaczmarczyk Secure Unanimous Jury Verdict for Trust Beneficiaries
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty: A Growing Source of Probate Litigation
- 13 Reminger Estate & Trust Attorneys Recognized in 2025 Edition of Best Lawyers in America











