Cincinnati Bar Assoc. v. Roberston, Ohio Supreme Court Case No. 2014-068, 2016-Ohio-654. An attorney was retained to represent a fiduciary in her capacity as executor of her father's estate. Three siblings who were beneficiaries of the estate attempted to remove the executor and filed objections to the estate inventory, arguing that the executor and her husband had improperly removed items from the estate. The attorney defended the executor and her husband against the family members' objections and their attempt to remove her. The attorney failed to explain to the executor that the representation of her and her husband in their personal capacities created a conflict of interest with the estate. Specifically, the attorney could not discharge his duty of undivided loyalty to the estate while also providing the same duty to the alleged wrongdoers. Accordingly, the attorney was found to violate Ohio Rule of Professional Conduct 1.7(b), prohibiting a lawyer from accepting or continuing representation of a client if a conflict of interest would be created.
Recent Posts
- Jessica Forrest Named a Notable Woman in Law by Crain's Cleveland Business
- Adam Fried Provides Testimony Opposing Ohio HB 172
- Welcome, Michael Brody!
- Changing Addresses with the USPS… not so fast
- Family Disputes can Wreak Havoc with Estate Planning
- 13 Reminger Estate & Trust Attorneys Recognized in 2024 Edition of Best Lawyers in America
- New Rules of Civil Procedure for 2023
- Avoiding Probate Litigation: Attorneys Can Help Families Prevent Costly Disputes
- Confidentiality and Privilege in Post-Death Disputes: Is it time to Tweak R.C. 2317.02?
- Adriann McGee and Mary Kraft Obtain Jury Verdict and Attorney Fees in Breach of Fiduciary Case Involving Power of Attorney Abuse