When a declaratory-judgment action was brought to challenge the appellant using a power of attorney to execute a transfer-on-death deed in order to transfer the decedent’s residence to the appellant upon the decedent’s death, the appellant relied upon an affidavit from the decedent’s attorney in support of her brief in opposition to the appellee’s motion for summary judgment. In such cases, a presumption of undue influence arises, and the power of attorney must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that such conduct was free of undue influence or fraud. The trial court held it could not consider this evidence in the appellant’s attempt to meet the burden of proof as to the fairness of the transaction between the appellant and the decedent because the appellee, as the decedent’s executor, refused to waive the estate’s attorney-client privilege. The appellate court reversed, holding that the affidavit should have been considered and remanding the matter with instructions for the trial court to consider the affidavit.
- Changes to Ohio’s Rules of Civil Procedure Effective July 1, 2020
- Mediation: An Alternative Approach to Estate and Trust Controversies in the Time of Coronavirus
- You Can Count on Reminger During These Uncertain Times
- Ohio’s Response to COVID-19 Impacting Probate/Trust Law and the Courts
- Estate Planning in Light of Coronavirus (COVID-19)
- In re Estate of Shaffer – Does the Voiding Statute Apply to Non-Conforming Wills?
- Adam M. Fried Scheduled to Speak at 2020 The Ohio American College of Trust and Estate Counsel Fellow Meeting
- Timothy Gallagher and Paul Shugar Author Article for January/February 2020 Issue of Probate Law Journal of Ohio
- Attorney Ethics Investigation Uncovers Financial Abuse
- Franklin Malemud Authors Article for November/December 2019 Issue of Probate Law Journal of Ohio