Estate of Bevery Hersh, 1st Dist. No. C-130212, 2014-Ohio-612. A trust beneficiary joined all the other parties in signing an agreed-judgment entry to distribute funds from the trust to the trust beneficiaries. The beneficiary then filed a motion to vacate the entry and asked that another proposed judgment entry be adopted instead. The parties, however, could not reach further agreement, and the court upheld the original judgment entry. The beneficiary appealed this decision, claiming that the court was improperly substituting its own discretion for that of the trustees. Yet the appellate court upheld the trial court's determination because the beneficiary had failed to show the required mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect to relieve the beneficiary from the final judgment under Ohio Civil Rule 60(B)(1). The appellate court found that courts are not inclined to find excusable neglect in situations where an attorney's alleged neglectful conduct is the basis for the motion to vacate. Accordingly, the appellate court found that the lower court did not abuse its discretion by failing to vacate the agreed-judgment entry that the parties had drafted, signed, and presented to the lower court.
Recent Posts
- Jessica Forrest Named a Notable Woman in Law by Crain's Cleveland Business
- Adam Fried Provides Testimony Opposing Ohio HB 172
- Welcome, Michael Brody!
- Changing Addresses with the USPS… not so fast
- Family Disputes can Wreak Havoc with Estate Planning
- 13 Reminger Estate & Trust Attorneys Recognized in 2024 Edition of Best Lawyers in America
- New Rules of Civil Procedure for 2023
- Avoiding Probate Litigation: Attorneys Can Help Families Prevent Costly Disputes
- Confidentiality and Privilege in Post-Death Disputes: Is it time to Tweak R.C. 2317.02?
- Adriann McGee and Mary Kraft Obtain Jury Verdict and Attorney Fees in Breach of Fiduciary Case Involving Power of Attorney Abuse