Fischer v. Kratus, 8th Dist. No. CV-12-789598. The plaintiffs sought to prohibit the use of statements that the decedent made to the defendant from being used in the defendant's motion for summary judgment. The decedent was the settlor and sole beneficiary of the trust, and the plaintiff contended that the statements were hearsay—statements made by someone other than the declarant to prove the truth of the matter asserted. The court found that even if the various questions/statements of the decedent were deemed hearsay, all were admissible under Ohio Evidence Rule 803(3) because the statements showed the decedent's state of mind regarding her assets. The court relied upon numerous cases that permit a statement by an individual in various settings that express a then existing mental, emotional, or physical condition. In this matter, the court found that the intent to plan as to the decedent's assets was the basis of the decedent's statement to the defendant and was therefore admissible.
Recent Posts
- Jessica Forrest Named a Notable Woman in Law by Crain's Cleveland Business
- Adam Fried Provides Testimony Opposing Ohio HB 172
- Welcome, Michael Brody!
- Changing Addresses with the USPS… not so fast
- Family Disputes can Wreak Havoc with Estate Planning
- 13 Reminger Estate & Trust Attorneys Recognized in 2024 Edition of Best Lawyers in America
- New Rules of Civil Procedure for 2023
- Avoiding Probate Litigation: Attorneys Can Help Families Prevent Costly Disputes
- Confidentiality and Privilege in Post-Death Disputes: Is it time to Tweak R.C. 2317.02?
- Adriann McGee and Mary Kraft Obtain Jury Verdict and Attorney Fees in Breach of Fiduciary Case Involving Power of Attorney Abuse