Hohler v. Hohler, 185 Ohio App.3d 420, 2009-Ohio-7013. Prior to marriage the surviving spouse and decedent entered into a prenuptial agreement. A year later, the husband died. His will left nothing to the spouse. The surviving spouse attempted to void the prenuptial agreement, claiming the decedent failed to fully disclose his assets. The court of appeals determined that the surviving spouse has a statutory right to waive the husband's attorney-client privilege under Ohio Revised Code section 2317.02(A), even though the spouse is in a conflict of interest with her husband's estate. The court of appeals remanded the case to determine whether the attorney could protect his work product from the spouse, a question different from the attorney-client privilege issue.
Recent Posts
- Shana DeMooy Appointed to Ohio State Bar Association Estate Planning, Trust, and Probate Law Section Council
- Weathering the Coming “Probate Storm”
- Reminger Secures Favorable Probate Court Judgment in Undue Influence Dispute
- Love, Death, And Litigation: Enforcing Prenuptial Agreements Upon Death
- The Illusion of Competence: Surviving the AI Wave Through Bans, Disclosures, and Bots
- Forrest and Gallagher secure a dismissal with prejudice in trust and fiduciary litigation involving the estate of the late Eric Carmen, a musician and Cleveland native
- Shana DeMooy Featured in Columbus Jewish News Local Lawyers / Super Attorneys 2026
- Jessica Forrest Elected as a Member of the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel (ACTEC)
- Michael Brody and Paul Shugar Secure Positive Result in Trust Dispute
- Strategies for Litigation-Proofing Estate Plans











