Cundell v. U.S. Bank, Hamilton App. Nos. C-070081, C-070082, 2007-Ohio-7067. This case involves interpretation of the Ohio Trust Code which went into effect on January 1, 2007. The case discussed when the Trust Code can be retroactively applied as well as how courts in Ohio obtain jurisdiction over non-resident Trust beneficiaries in Ohio trust litigation cases. Notably, when trust beneficiaries receive money distributed from a trust that is administered in Ohio, the beneficiaries subject themselves to the jurisdiction of Ohio courts. Additionally, the case further discusses the concept of imposing a constructive Trust on people who obtain assets as a result of wrong doing.
Recent Posts
- Shana DeMooy Appointed to Ohio State Bar Association Estate Planning, Trust, and Probate Law Section Council
- Weathering the Coming “Probate Storm”
- Reminger Secures Favorable Probate Court Judgment in Undue Influence Dispute
- Love, Death, And Litigation: Enforcing Prenuptial Agreements Upon Death
- The Illusion of Competence: Surviving the AI Wave Through Bans, Disclosures, and Bots
- Forrest and Gallagher secure a dismissal with prejudice in trust and fiduciary litigation involving the estate of the late Eric Carmen, a musician and Cleveland native
- Shana DeMooy Featured in Columbus Jewish News Local Lawyers / Super Attorneys 2026
- Jessica Forrest Elected as a Member of the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel (ACTEC)
- Michael Brody and Paul Shugar Secure Positive Result in Trust Dispute
- Strategies for Litigation-Proofing Estate Plans











