Inheritance disputes are often motivated by principle and emotion. No matter how right a claimant thinks they are, the style and approach to their case may create financial risk in paying another’s attorney fees and/or depleting any inheritance the claimant otherwise would receive. Choosing the right attorney will help you navigate this risk.
Inheritance claim litigation often involve claims to invalidate documents or transactions through declaratory judgment claims as well as the pursuit of breach of fiduciary duty claims. Ohio follows the American rule which generally provides that in litigation each party bears his or her own attorney fees. However, in certain circumstances, or in any dispute involving a trust, Ohio has enacted statutes that authorize a court to allocate attorney fees based on equity.
Ohio’s Declaratory Judgment statute allows a trial court to award attorney fees to a “fiduciary, beneficiary, or other interested party” to be paid “out of the trust property, the estate property, or other property that is the subject of the fiduciary relationship * * * in accordance with equitable principles” if the attorney fees are for services “beneficial to the trust or estate.” O.R.C. 2721.16(A)(1)(c). Similarly, the Ohio Trust Code provides that in trust litigation the trial court “as justice and equity may require, may award costs, expenses and reasonable attorney fees” to any party “to be paid by another party, from the Trust that is the subject of the controversy or from a party’s interest that is the subject of the controversy.” O.R.C. 5810.04.
Both of these statutes rely on equitable principles, which in simple terms means principles of “fairness”. These statutes invite a court to consider the unique facts and circumstances of each case to determine whether a claimant should have their fees paid by an estate, gross trust, trust share or by an adverse party. Conversely, the same statutes also invite the court to determine whether a claimant’s case and litigation justify the Court to require the claimant to pay their own attorney fees and/or the fees of other parties. The application of these statutory provisions in Estate and Trust litigation could be beneficial to a claimant, but also could be a landmine causing a claimant to unexpectedly pay another party’s attorney fees. This risk could have the effect of reducing or eliminating financial benefit the claimant otherwise would receive through an inheritance.
For example, in a recent case Reminger represented two sisters who requested a probate court declare them beneficiaries of a Last Will and Testament (“Will”) with their brother claiming he was the only beneficiary under the language of the Will. Even after fact discovery revealed the attorney that drafted the Will believed the sisters were equal beneficiaries the brother continued aggressively fighting. The trial court agreed with our clients that they were equal beneficiaries and ordered our clients’ attorney fees be paid by the gross probate estate and declining the brother’s request that his fees be paid from the estate. In effect, the disgruntled brother’s approach to litigation gave the court a basis to cause him to pay 1/3 of his sisters’ attorney fees plus 100% of his own attorney’s fees. These expenses borne by the brother practically eliminated any net benefit he would inherit through the probate estate.
Attorneys in Reminger’s Estate and Trust Litigation Group have more than 100 years of collective experience litigating inheritance claim disputes. Contact us today to utilize our counsel to navigate these types of disputes so that you can make informed, strategic decisions on how to approach your litigation.
- Welcome, Michael Brody!
- Changing Addresses with the USPS… not so fast
- Family Disputes can Wreak Havoc with Estate Planning
- 13 Reminger Estate & Trust Attorneys Recognized in 2024 Edition of Best Lawyers in America
- New Rules of Civil Procedure for 2023
- Avoiding Probate Litigation: Attorneys Can Help Families Prevent Costly Disputes
- Confidentiality and Privilege in Post-Death Disputes: Is it time to Tweak R.C. 2317.02?
- Adriann McGee and Mary Kraft Obtain Jury Verdict and Attorney Fees in Breach of Fiduciary Case Involving Power of Attorney Abuse
- Cleveland Jewish News goes one-on-one with Adam Fried
- Analysis of the Amendments to Ohio Rule of Superintendence Rule 66